But now the video playback (at least on youtube) without flash does not cause much more overhead than if I was playing the video using native video player. Especially when the HTML video playback was terribly optimized and caused huge overhead. I've lived without flash or any replacements for at least two years now.
Thus, it sounds like the releases of Adobe's flash player for Linux might be a bit different from now on.
#What is adobe pepper flash player helper install
5.Īccording to the Adobe knowledge base, Chrome includes a flash player, but to use flash in Chromium, one must install it from Adobe's site.Īdobe's web-log says that they will be releasing both Netscape and Pepper flash player for Linux and keeping the major versions synchronized. I'm currently working on the dematerialization circuit for my blue box.īased on this Google web-log, Google is deprecating flash in Chrome in favour of H.T.M.L. Oh well, at least Hulu doesn't need to have fake-hal anymore.įirst things first, but not necessarily in that order.Īpologies if I take a while to respond. So much for my plans to completely ditch adobe flash. I seem to recall Google was maintaining their own. I can confirm adobe-flash is required to play flash content in chromium. The flash player is now provided by www-plugins/adobe-flash:22 Seems like no one thought about environmental friendliness while pushing for a successor to Adobe Flash With Adobe Flash the GPU and CPU load is significantly lower and equals power and energy savings = less heat, Were the last versions that let chromium display the Adobe flash Plugin in about:plugins Posted: Fri 8:54 pm Post subject: www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins no FLASH ?ĭid I miss something or why is there no flash plugin included anymore in www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins ? Location: Vienna, Austria Germany hello world :) Www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins no FLASH ? Gentoo Forums :: View topic - www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins no FLASH ?